Inuagural Draft - 2020

Blue wrote:You were right. updated.

Blue wrote:

Bumstead wrote:Hey, I did not mean to select that guy...I thought that was Rodger McIndoe, 2B. Can I pick someone else?

NO. FUCK OFF...

lol. i have Roger.

the guy you took is a College OFer. PM me the name/id # of the guy you want and I'll make the change.

Bumstead wrote:Hey, I did not mean to select that guy...I thought that was Rodger McIndoe, 2B. Can I pick someone else?

WhoDat wrote:

Rich wrote:

WhoDat wrote:

Rich wrote:

Whitby wrote:Personally, I would prefer to keep going with the utility. Seems to work just fine to me. The only issue I have is moving players up and down. The blue arrow buttons don't seem to work very well. However, I am fine if we go to in game lists. I think it gives you a little less control, as I prefer making my pick manually, but if that is the direction we go then fine. As long as we have time to customize our in game lists.

The problem is if the teams don't pick and the utility picks college players. I won't be around to replace them with draft eligible players.

Problem is that looking at the Draft Pool in-game the college players appear on that list as well. Looks like essentially the next ammy draft class is in the list.

thats good I just want to see if they are not draftable. Hopefully they can't be drafted even though they are on the list.


give me an example- because the college players picked by Getch so far where not draftable in game by me.

Well I can only look at the 'Draft Pool' under 'transactions' and not under 'Inaugural Draft'

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Rich wrote:

WhoDat wrote:

Rich wrote:

Whitby wrote:Personally, I would prefer to keep going with the utility. Seems to work just fine to me. The only issue I have is moving players up and down. The blue arrow buttons don't seem to work very well. However, I am fine if we go to in game lists. I think it gives you a little less control, as I prefer making my pick manually, but if that is the direction we go then fine. As long as we have time to customize our in game lists.

The problem is if the teams don't pick and the utility picks college players. I won't be around to replace them with draft eligible players.

Problem is that looking at the Draft Pool in-game the college players appear on that list as well. Looks like essentially the next ammy draft class is in the list.

give me an example- because the college players picked by Getch so far where not draftable in game by me.

WhoDat wrote:

Rich wrote:

Whitby wrote:Personally, I would prefer to keep going with the utility. Seems to work just fine to me. The only issue I have is moving players up and down. The blue arrow buttons don't seem to work very well. However, I am fine if we go to in game lists. I think it gives you a little less control, as I prefer making my pick manually, but if that is the direction we go then fine. As long as we have time to customize our in game lists.

The problem is if the teams don't pick and the utility picks college players. I won't be around to replace them with draft eligible players.

Problem is that looking at the Draft Pool in-game the college players appear on that list as well. Looks like essentially the next ammy draft class is in the list.

KMcBride wrote:

WhoDat wrote:

Rich wrote:

Whitby wrote:Personally, I would prefer to keep going with the utility. Seems to work just fine to me. The only issue I have is moving players up and down. The blue arrow buttons don't seem to work very well. However, I am fine if we go to in game lists. I think it gives you a little less control, as I prefer making my pick manually, but if that is the direction we go then fine. As long as we have time to customize our in game lists.

The problem is if the teams don't pick and the utility picks college players. I won't be around to replace them with draft eligible players.

Problem is that looking at the Draft Pool in-game the college players appear on that list as well. Looks like essentially the next ammy draft class is in the list.

So are a bunch of 40+ y/o players, who for some f%cking reason, my scouting director insists on putting in the top five every time I ask him for an updated list.

WhoDat wrote:

Rich wrote:

Whitby wrote:Personally, I would prefer to keep going with the utility. Seems to work just fine to me. The only issue I have is moving players up and down. The blue arrow buttons don't seem to work very well. However, I am fine if we go to in game lists. I think it gives you a little less control, as I prefer making my pick manually, but if that is the direction we go then fine. As long as we have time to customize our in game lists.

The problem is if the teams don't pick and the utility picks college players. I won't be around to replace them with draft eligible players.

Problem is that looking at the Draft Pool in-game the college players appear on that list as well. Looks like essentially the next ammy draft class is in the list.

Rich wrote:

Whitby wrote:Personally, I would prefer to keep going with the utility. Seems to work just fine to me. The only issue I have is moving players up and down. The blue arrow buttons don't seem to work very well. However, I am fine if we go to in game lists. I think it gives you a little less control, as I prefer making my pick manually, but if that is the direction we go then fine. As long as we have time to customize our in game lists.

The problem is if the teams don't pick and the utility picks college players. I won't be around to replace them with draft eligible players.

Bumstead wrote:To avoid more whining (and then just allowing auto-picking directly following the whining, etc.) I am willing to start over Tuesday with everyone having their scout provide a list in-game and do the draft in-game. I will take the under on 17 teams actually setting a freaking list...this is comical. Come here to complain but won't put up a list that is long enough to sustain them being gone however long they need to be. And they think we should be held hostage by their dumb choices. Ridiculous. This is the way this draft is. It is too late to change that for your own personal needs. Protect yourself according to how THIS draft is being run. YOU ARE IN THIS LEAGUE...not some league from some other time...

Whitby wrote:Personally, I would prefer to keep going with the utility. Seems to work just fine to me. The only issue I have is moving players up and down. The blue arrow buttons don't seem to work very well. However, I am fine if we go to in game lists. I think it gives you a little less control, as I prefer making my pick manually, but if that is the direction we go then fine. As long as we have time to customize our in game lists.

Whitby wrote:

Rich wrote:Tim Montgomery- Don't see him in the game?

He is there. I can see him in game.

Rich wrote:Tim Montgomery- Don't see him in the game?

Rich wrote:Tim Montgomery- Don't see him in the game?

Neil_MissoulaGM wrote:

Fine by me, I'd have been up watching the Pack anyways if it had been tonight. I'm going for the perfect weekend, Wigan Athletic won (hometown team) Notre Dame won and hopefully Green Bay can make it the hat trick and the Celtics could make it 4 for 4, pity there's no NHL season or I may have been going with a 5 for 5 with the Maple Leafs.

Bumstead wrote:

Rich wrote:

yeah no lists in game. Doesn't matter to me but I don't want to do it and have someone who is not on now bitch later.

When does that ever happen?

Rich wrote:

yeah no lists in game. Doesn't matter to me but I don't want to do it and have someone who is not on now bitch later.

WhoDat wrote:

Rich wrote:How about if you want me to update your scouting lists for all rounds let me know.

Have you processed any exports since you released all the players and started the draft?

If not then no one would have lists in-game? correct?

So what harm would it do to have the scout generate lists for all rounds?